On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Tamas Szekeres <szeker...@gmail.com> wrote: > This doc is fairly old (written by me ;-) , but the build process hasn't > been changed for years. What did you mean by "it doesn't appear to be > included as part of any existing build/packaging process"?
I guess what I meant here is that the building of the swig bindings for some particular language aren't in, say, the root "makefile.vc". And the scripts that perhaps do do some sort of build (though, not that I'm actually using at the moment) need to be called directly. I.e. I had sort of assumed that I'd end up, at some point, with the swig stuff distributed in the same fashion that I do with the rest of gdal, when I do "nmake ... install" (in the end I've just hacked the scripts to do this, but clearly that's not ideal ...) Anyway, thanks for your help, and there only remains one problem to solve (I think with the signing of the swig generated stuff; .NET is upset about some sort of code calling native libs ...) then it might just work! > Best regards, > > Tamas -- Noon _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev