On 10/23/2017 04:23 PM, jratike80 wrote: > Ari Jolma-2 wrote >> I could begin with the gdalinfo WCS:... to list the subdatasets. I guess >> that's enough for some time. > My personal opinion is that developing anything for WCS 1.x versions is > waste of time. WCS 2.x is much better standard and it is quite a lot > different than 1.x. > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > > > -- > Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
yes. major version change means: incompatibilities can be expected. Actually, WCS 1 and 2 _are_ incompatibly different. WCS 1 essentially dates back to ~2000, a lot of lessons have been learnt since then. -Peter -- Dr. Peter Baumann - Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann mail: p.baum...@jacobs-university.de tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178 - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793) www.rasdaman.com, mail: baum...@rasdaman.com tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882 "Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083) _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
