Surely, ant page moved can be updated with link to its new home. Bigger, IMHO, issue is to decide what's worth to be migrated. Similar issue was with zillion-page Trac wiki of Boost project, where many of pages where scratch notes, or incomplete/random garbage.
Mateusz Loskot, mate...@loskot.net (Sent from mobile) On Thu, 21 Mar 2019, 15:39 Kurt Schwehr, <schw...@gmail.com> wrote: > If they are moved, can we put a redirect or at least leave a link to the > new location? I am sure there are a huge number of links on the interwebs > to the wiki and it would be a major bummer to have those all go dead. > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 7:04 AM Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 12:45, Jeff McKenna >> <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote: >> > >> > I spent much effort >> > to manually create all of the existing Trac wiki pages, onto Github, by >> > hand (and then we made the Trac wiki read-only). This should be done >> > also for GDAL (but maybe now there is a more automated way). >> >> I have wondered what should be done about the Wiki pages too. >> Do you think all pages qualify to be moved? >> >> Perhaps those up to date and important should be marked >> w/ "TODO: Move to GitHub" first, then it will be clear what to move. >> >> Best regards, >> -- >> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
