On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 17:01, Howard Butler <how...@hobu.co> wrote: > On Mar 27, 2019, at 5:56 AM, Jeff McKenna <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com> > wrote: >> On 2019-03-26 8:58 AM, Even Rouault wrote: >>> >>> 3) migrate part of Trac wiki to the future official RST doc, abandon&kill >>> remaining non relevant info, and have no wiki at all. In the final state, >>> the >>> whole doc is the RST doc (PROJ current situation) >>> 4) migrate part of Trac wiki to the future official RST doc, migrate >>> remaining >>> doc to gitub wiki, and kill Trac wiki. >>> 3) or 4) would seem the most preferable outcome to me. >> >> >> I prefer #4, but leave the old wiki pages in place & set them to read-only. > > I prefer #3, which is also the same situation that PROJ and MapServer have. > The problem with wikis is rot (...)
Good point. It is so easy to propose a change via PR that wiki's particular advantage of being openly editable diminished. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
