I like 3.0 as well. -jeff
On 2019-05-01 3:56 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
As a feedback from the previous motion, it appears that GDAL 3.0 would
probably better reflect the API & behaviour changes that have been done,
and
be in accordance with our HOWTO-RELEASE procedure and semantic versionning
rules.
I'm OK with that change.
If we decide for that, the plan would probably be:
- change in docs & other materials the references to 2.5 to 3.0
- create a release/3.0 branch from the HEAD of release/2.5
- abandon release/2.5 branch (that is: backports would be done in
release/3.0,
and for longer support in release/2.4 when appropriate)
- issue a 3.0.0RC1 from that
- call master 3.1dev
Thoughts ?
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
--
Jeff McKenna
MapServer Consulting and Training Services
https://gatewaygeomatics.com/
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
