It's a year of major version bump in GIS. Proj 6 (2x3), PostGIS 3, possibly pgRouting 3. Three is a popular GIS version number this year.
I'd +1. Only question is whether you have plans for even more major API breaks this year, so that 3.0 sticks for a little while. On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 4:56 AM Daniel Morissette <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to calling it 3.0 and to your proposed plan. > > Thank you Even. > > Daniel > > > On 2019-05-01 14:56, Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > As a feedback from the previous motion, it appears that GDAL 3.0 would > > > > probably better reflect the API & behaviour changes that have been done, > > and > > > > be in accordance with our HOWTO-RELEASE procedure and semantic > versionning > > > > rules. > > > > > > I'm OK with that change. > > > > > > If we decide for that, the plan would probably be: > > > > - change in docs & other materials the references to 2.5 to 3.0 > > > > - create a release/3.0 branch from the HEAD of release/2.5 > > > > - abandon release/2.5 branch (that is: backports would be done in > > release/3.0, > > > > and for longer support in release/2.4 when appropriate) > > > > - issue a 3.0.0RC1 from that > > > > - call master 3.1dev > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > Even > > > > > > -- > > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > > http://www.spatialys.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gdal-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > > > > > -- > Daniel Morissette > Mapgears Inc > T: +1 418-696-5056 #201 > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- Darafei Praliaskouski Support me: http://patreon.com/komzpa
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
