Indeed, this is right. My bad.. ________________________________ De : Andrew C Aitchison <and...@aitchison.me.uk> Envoyé : lundi 17 octobre 2022 10:25 À : Nicolas Godet <nicolas.go...@outlook.fr> Cc : gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> Objet : Re: [gdal-dev] [Doc] gdal_calc.py extent option
On Mon, 17 Oct 2022, Nicolas Godet wrote: > Dear Devs, > > In documentation<https://gdal.org/programs/gdal_calc.html#cmdoption-extent>, > extent param description seems a bit odd to me. > > > union - the extent (bounds) of the output will be the minimal > rectangle that contains all the input extents. > > intersect - the extent (bounds) of the output will be the maximal > rectangle that is contained in all the input extents. > > Shouldn't it be the other way around? I think this *is* the right way round; "all" can be misunderstood but I can not think of a clearer phrasing, although "every one of" might help. > As I intend to add this option to QGIS gdal_calc window (very useful > option), I must be sure. -- Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK and...@aitchison.me.uk
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
