On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:03:33 +0100, Nick wrote: >On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:39:37 -0700 >Matthew Brush <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The patches were committed[1][2].
Cool! (btw, I also didn't get the mails from the SF tracker although I'm monitoring it, also not all of these mails didn't arrive on the scintilla list, so I'd say also it's a problem at SF) >> So now, can we patch our copy of Scintilla, or do we need to wait >> until their next release and then until we update to that version? > >We can patch our copy now. > >> I'm pretty confident those patches will apply cleanly on versions >> between ours and what they just got committed to, though I don't >> really understand Scintilla versions and how/when we update. > >We update soon after a Scintilla release unless it's a major Scintilla >release that may introduce bugs. Currently there is the problem with dropped support for old C++ compilers which may not affect us directly but more over the introduction of new C++0x code. For details see http://groups.google.com/group/scintilla-interest/browse_thread/thread/8f9c4aae5f5c5368/6ecc660f51cecefc. Though Scintilla's release notes state that the Borland C++ support was removed, I'm not sure if the new C++0x code is already in. Nick, Lex, do you know more about the current status? Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgp57v49xj5At.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
