On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:56:44 +0100, Nick wrote: >On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:17:26 +1100 >Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Currently there is the problem with dropped support for old C++ >> >> compilers which may not affect us directly but more over the >> >> introduction of new C++0x code. >> >> For details see >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/scintilla-interest/browse_thread/thread/8f9c4aae5f5c5368/6ecc660f51cecefc. >> >> Though Scintilla's release notes state that the Borland C++ >> >> support was removed, I'm not sure if the new C++0x code is >> >> already in. Nick, Lex, do you know more about the current status? >> > >> > Good question, thanks Enrico for asking it :) >> > Actually there is another patch that was applied to upstream >> > Sinctilla I would like to see in our copy (related to Vala >> > highlighting), so I wondered if we didn't wanted to update our >> > scintilla copy at some point... but there is the C++0x thing. >> > >> >> Well Scintilla 2.25 does not use the std=c++0x option and it does use >> -Wall which includes a c++0x warning so I would say its reasonably >> safe. > >Yes, and I'd expect Neil to mention it in the release notes if the >requirements change. Now that C++0x has been finalised as C++ 2011 this >might encourage him :-/
Ok, then we could update our Scintilla copy soon, either with the current release and patch Matthew's patches in or wait for the next release which includes the patches. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgps794wuBiMm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
