On Thu, 05 May 2011 00:40:43 +0200, Colomban wrote:
>> Also, it would make it easier to migrate to using Glade 3 with >> GtkBuilder instead of Glade 2 > >Well, not completely sure about this, even though I like GtkBuilder and >Glade3 (it's soooo nicer than Glade2 :p): GtkBuilder was *introduced* >in 2.12, which means the code is quite young with this release, maybe >having important issues. I don't mean we shouldn't try to use it, but >simply that it may be a problem because some important fixes might have >happened in a newer release. Good point. But there is probably one way to find it out: test it :). Seriously, I think we could try to get a rough converted version and then test it on GTK 2.12.0 (or .x) to check how it works. But not today and tomorrow. >> (and in the long term makes getting >> compatible with GTK3 easier, but really, later :D). > >Honestly it shouldn't be that hard to support GTK3 at some point since >AFAIK we don't rely on the things that have largely changed in GTK3 >(size allocation, Cairo rendering, ...). Yeah. I guess the most obvious change will be GSEAL as mentioned in another post in this thread. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgpb0Wk2eXhRf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
