Le 13/06/2011 19:45, Enrico Tröger a écrit : > On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:38:23 +0200, Colomban wrote: > >> Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit : >>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200 >>> Enrico Tröger <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote: >>>> >>>>> Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit : >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany >>>>>> to GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)? >>>>>> >>>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>> Any new on the subject? Should we go on an start moving? >>>> >>>> Yeah, I'd say let's go! >>> >>> I second this. >> >> Okay, let's do then :) >> However, I just realized that GTK 2.12 [1] depends on GLib 2.14, not >> 2.16 [2] as you suggested so... do we depend on GLib 2.14 (as GTK 2.12) >> or 2.16 (to get GIO in)? > > I wanted GLib 2.16 because of GIO to get rid of #ifdefs. > And based on Debian Lenny's GTK/Glib versions, I suggested the > combination of GTK 2.12 and GLib 2.16 although they were not released > in the same cycle.
Fine for me, just wanted to check what you meant exactly. An I agree that having GIO in is one of the important thing to get rid of many #ifedfs. > Btw, Nick is using GTK 2.12, so unless there is a super cool fancy > feature in GTK 2.14 we cannot miss, I'd say 2.12 is ok for now. No, I don't know of anything special that would make depending on 2.14 so much better. 2.12's fine. I'll then do the bump soon. Cheers, Colomban _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
