-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 2012.06.12 10:33, Frank Lanitz rašė: > Am 12.06.2012 09:17, schrieb gymka: >> 2012.06.12 10:09, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov rašė: >>> Thank you, Frank >> >>> The last stable version of Geany is 0.21, what is the reason to >>> increase it to 1.22? I am just curious, >> >>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Frank Lanitz >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:01 +0600 Baurzhan Muftakhidinov >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Updated Kazakh translation is attached. >>>> >>>> Thank you very much. I've added it to master, but needed to >>>> correct the version string as next release will be 1.22(!) >>>> release. Also I did run a updatepo onto. So please don't be >>>> confused ;) >>>> >> 1.22 is typing error, new version will be 0.22(as is said in >> thread) > > No, it will be 1.22. I has been decided within a poll. I don't > understand this but most people liked to have an 1 as first digit > to show geany is becoming some kind of more professional, stable... > whatever. > then it's stupid decision:)
- -- gymka GPG ID: 21C70548 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP1vHuAAoJEAVeyH4hxwVIZkMH/RAal9xE5UOtuhFDPitWeCdV ufB1EV8s0guUy5xFtfUR3M3WzpJmi9QZQvkmGkZHlfbA3I4kSangsLf/wa0x4ftS 54X8g8xgLEgaaV9vG7z5kEaphzWbDOdfLbuVOIWoWvPBEE+DWJNku2Rr0oxf0c3T LXRB/DMvM1Czt4MhOfmV0Xz2ZCWEERgfMmo+AhxY80WtPrK6YYdTMeWhysW1CGm6 7QDKr0hHWl9M5jnYtqZzBK3wL77UAUOh8QvK8LPD75/wEn4MBiFy0KqOwMbWqvG8 BCsdeqx1K6yX5/wZD6pRHS/n6obm3hIPitrrMepE0YSIRXeJMRiu1g9gu4PyvP0= =a34A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
0x21C70548.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
_______________________________________________ Geany-i18n mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-i18n
