On 12/06/12 09:38, gymka wrote: > 2012.06.12 10:33, Frank Lanitz rašė: >> Am 12.06.2012 09:17, schrieb gymka: >>> 2012.06.12 10:09, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov rašė: >>>> Thank you, Frank >>> >>>> The last stable version of Geany is 0.21, what is the reason to >>>> increase it to 1.22? I am just curious, >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Frank Lanitz >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:01 +0600 Baurzhan Muftakhidinov >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> Updated Kazakh translation is attached. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you very much. I've added it to master, but needed to >>>>> correct the version string as next release will be 1.22(!) >>>>> release. Also I did run a updatepo onto. So please don't be >>>>> confused ;) >>>>> >>> 1.22 is typing error, new version will be 0.22(as is said in >>> thread) > >> No, it will be 1.22. I has been decided within a poll. I don't >> understand this but most people liked to have an 1 as first digit >> to show geany is becoming some kind of more professional, stable... >> whatever. > > then it's stupid decision:)
It is not. There were quite some discussions about it, better first try to read them as they can be found in the archives of the devel mailing list, and finally there was a poll about the next version to get more users included to find a sane discussion. However, not that many people voted at all. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-i18n mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-i18n
