Hi guys,
[snip]
>If the user cancels, the page is restored as it was before action
>started thanks to the undo stuff. But this is not the job of the
>undo. The undo should be limited to undoing confirmed changes
>only. Remember that the action is not finished until the user confirms
>the changes.
Agreed. The undo mechanism really should not be used for anything
BUT undoing user commands. Using undo to restore internal state changes
is asking for trouble (as there was one bug I noticed that was caused
by this a while ago).
>Note: since it is based on 20061020 it is lacking the lastest changes
>from HEAD (the gettext fix for example).
>
Patrick, you may want to start working against CVS HEAD, as it
will make everybody's life a little easier when it comes down to merging
patches/changes. Thanks.
Okay, so now the question is how to proceed. I need to look at
Patrick's code changes first. Sorry to say this, but let's hold off
merging glist_dev for a little bit till I've looked at them.
Werner, please merge your auto number branch.
Carlos, what's your thoughts on all this? I am still very interested
in getting your GList changes into HEAD.
PeterC, how about you, how does this delay impact your work/patches?
-Ales
_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
