All, Oh no, not again... We have already had this _exact_ same endless discussion a couple of months ago. People, please go back into the archives and re-read the previous discussion and take all follow up offline. Please?
[ snip everything cause it has been hashed out before ] Joerg, Posting the same complaints again and again, does *not* help your cause and will not generate any action/attention/sympathy. Again, please read and act upon the advice given at: http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:faq#tool_xxx_is_missing_critical_feature_yyy_what_can_i_do In particular bullets one and three. I think that all developer goodwill and kindness (bullet two) has already been spent in full. In the end, my final recommendation is that you go out and purchase a commercial EDA package that meets all of _your_ needs. This project is really not for people who are unwilling/unable to accept the published goals/approach [1]. Let's all try very hard to avoid such repeat threads in the future. Thank you, -Ales [1] The gEDA project's goals/approach are clearly documented at: http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:faq Please read it in full. If you do not agree with these goals, please find some other mailing lists to inhabit. Thank you. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user