Ales Hvezda wrote: > All, > > Oh no, not again... We have already had this _exact_ same endless > discussion a couple of months ago. People, please go back into the > archives and re-read the previous discussion and take all follow up > offline. Please? > > [ snip everything cause it has been hashed out before ] > > Joerg, > > Posting the same complaints again and again, does *not* help your cause > and will not generate any action/attention/sympathy. > > Again, please read and act upon the advice given at: > > http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:faq#tool_xxx_is_missing_critical_feature_yyy_what_can_i_do > > In particular bullets one and three. I think that all developer goodwill > and kindness (bullet two) has already been spent in full. > > In the end, my final recommendation is that you go out and purchase a > commercial EDA package that meets all of _your_ needs. This project is > really not for people who are unwilling/unable to accept the published > goals/approach [1]. > > Let's all try very hard to avoid such repeat threads in the future. > Thank you, > > -Ales > > [1] The gEDA project's goals/approach are clearly documented at: > > http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:faq > > Please read it in full. If you do not agree with these goals, please > find some other mailing lists to inhabit. Thank you. >
Well, I only explained it since John asked. He is probably a very good SW expert (which I am not) and was interested in this. No, I do not expect that this is going to be fixed just because I suggested it. And yes, I'll use other (commercial) SW for now, and maybe until I retire :-) -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user