> It is my impression that the PCB plugin system is almost the same, > except that the "well-known function" is used instead of static > constructors.
I originally did it with constructors, but to do it in C required a gcc extension. So I changed it. > Should plugins use the ".so" extension, (or is that ".dll) which > is system dependent, or should they use another extension that > is application specific but consistent across systems? I'd stick with whatever the system defines, so that we aren't trying to "hide" the file type. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user