> I think that the proper place to resolve this issue is in the actual > *licenses,* which as with OSS may vary from permissive to restrictive. I'd > like to see the evolution of at least one OSHW license where a requirement is > that the design files for the project-- and its derivative works --need to be > in open, documented formats.
Keep dreaming, bro. Maybe when gEDA reaches 1/10th the functionality/usability of say Protel. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
