On Aug 13, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 10:59 -0600, John Doty wrote: >> Remember, "pcb" isn't the only layout path we support. >> > > Yes. But I think the addition of net classes will not really break > something. Of course it will increase the code size, which is not really > nice. And it may decrease the working speed of PCB program. > > I have written a short summary of this idea: > > http://ssalewski.de/gEDA-Netclass.html.en
As you noticed, nets have properties, but they don't really have classes in any clean sense. So why not just have properties, and sets of properties. The set of properties of a net would then be the flattened union of the property attributes attached to it. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ j...@noqsi.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user