-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 14.08.2010 01:13, schrieb Stefan Salewski:
> Indeed currently I am still looking for a good reason against that > proposal. My best candidates: It is not too useful for small projects, > and it is some work to implement. I don't think that this is a good argument against it as long as you don't force small projects to use it. I would see it as an extension to the current gschem -> pcb flow. If you don't specify anything, you get the default net attributes as defined in PCB. > > I have to admit that I do not know much about "differential pairs" now, > but it is very important... If you go high frequency it's getting important. Related to that are termination requirements of a given net, carefully select whether the termination needs to be close to the driver or close to the receiver. Typically this is a problem a tool can't handle. > > > I guess it would be no great deal for smart (but very busy) people like > Peter C. and DJ, to implement the basic concept. For people not familiar > with the internals of gschem and PCB like me it may take very long... > I second that, and I read the response from DJ: You don't know how hard it can be to teach a hardware guy software concepts :-) . > Best regards > > Stefan Salewski > > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > - -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen Dietmar Schmunkamp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxl47UACgkQn22l+QvEah0pJwCgjcFzsqJqGpl0/vcJ99+HThne brUAn35r4OvjEO8a1TdakafoPPw8l4/A =xfvV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user