> I do not agree with the term high level here. I agree that there > may be layers of different types, that require special treatment. > These are low-level types, like "conductive" for layers that > electrically connect things, or "holes" for connections between > layers, and "other" for anything else.
We're talking about the same thing, but what you call "low level" I call "high level", since I'm considering their place in the heirarchy of categorization (conductor -> copper -> 1oz copper, or drawing -> assembly -> courtyards), not the data structures they're implemented with. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user