Martin Kupec <martin.ku...@kupson.cz> writes: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:00:04PM +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote: >> Martin Kupec <martin.ku...@kupson.cz> writes: >> > That is a bit complicated. I need a clean definition of layer types, so >> > one can pick the right layer when needed. But some attributes in >> > addition to layer type are possible. >> >> I do not understand that argument. > > Ok. We probably don't understand each other, so I will just state my fears. > > I would like to know about each drawing layer where it belongs to. > > If layers types would be defined by attributes, someone would be able to > declare one layer both as conductive and as silk for example. That could > cause me a nighmares. That is why I insist on 'typed' layers, not > 'tagged' layer.
Hmm. I think that is the old trap of overloading. When you say that a layer type defines what you can do with it, then this one type attribute becomes messily overloaded. -- Stephan _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user