On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak <k...@lilalaser.de> wrote: > Kovacs Levente wrote: > >> I think the workaround in gEDA is still a good way to go. > > The bogus DRC error potentially masks erroneous connections between > the planes elsewhere. > > What, if there was a way to flag a track as "don't look" for connectivity > check? You'd attach the flag to the segment that bridges the domains. > That way, the DRC check would still be sensitive to violations at other > places. Such a DRCignore flag might have more legitimate uses. E.g, the > outline lines may be be marked like this if vias deliberately hang over > the edge of the board. >
Yes, but then if I forgot that track for a given isolated ground plane, there would be no netlist error. That's why I was thinking more along the lines of a component that can exist on any layer. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user