All regressions pass, so there is no screwing up as far as I'm aware. I don't think it is used in any other place even. I'm happy to change the name of the proxy to be more descriptive if desired.
Andreas ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of nathan binkert [[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 7:46 PM To: gem5 Developer List Cc: Andreas Hansson Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: Python: Make the All proxy traverse SimObject children as well > No comments? It's not very controversial, but some feedback would be much > appreciated. Thanks. Will it screw up existing usage of all? We could do like other libraries and have two terms children (what all is now) and descendants which is what you're proposing. Nate -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
