On Nov. 20, 2015, 5:33 a.m., Tony Gutierrez wrote: > > I am still not really understanding the request and the packet part. How > > are the two related (are they)?
I have a patch to undo the packet ACQ/REL changes, and will post it soon. Honestly I think the original author of this patch may have only added the Command for ACQ/REL because they needed something to pass to the Packet() ctor and no other Commands fit, at least that is my best guess. - Tony ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3180/#review7622 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 19, 2015, 2:50 p.m., Tony Gutierrez wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3180/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 19, 2015, 2:50 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 11225:9e0fa0306f8b > --------------------------- > mem: add request types for acquire and release > > Add support for acquire and release requests. These synchronization > operations > are commonly supported by several modern instruction sets. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/packet.hh c0ea80fed78fef29ad2829b9d93e7bd568c46665 > src/mem/packet.cc c0ea80fed78fef29ad2829b9d93e7bd568c46665 > src/mem/request.hh c0ea80fed78fef29ad2829b9d93e7bd568c46665 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3180/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Tony Gutierrez > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev