Hi All, I would really appreciate if somebody commit this patch for me. If you think I'm qualified and/or don't want me to bother you anymore with my patches, please give me commit access :).
Thank you, Mohammad On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Mohammad Alian <m.alian1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Can somebody with commit access ship this path on behalf of me? > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/ > > Thanks, > Mohammad > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Andreas Hansson <andreas.hans...@arm.com> > wrote: > >> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/ >> >> Ship it! >> >> Ship It! >> >> >> - Andreas Hansson >> >> On May 30th, 2016, 1:32 p.m. UTC, Mohammad Alian wrote: >> Review request for Default. >> By Mohammad Alian. >> >> *Updated May 30, 2016, 1:32 p.m.* >> *Repository: * gem5 >> Description >> >> Changeset 11472:d97d6bf2206b >> --------------------------- >> dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch >> This patch fixes the order that packets gets pushed into the output fifo >> of etherswitch. If two packets arrive at the same tick to the etherswitch, >> we sort and push them based on their source port id. >> In dist-gem5 simulations, if there is no ordering inforced while two >> packets arrive at the same tick, it can lead to non-deterministic simulations >> >> Diffs >> >> - src/dev/net/etherswitch.hh (954d3014f7f0) >> - src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc (954d3014f7f0) >> - util/cpt_upgraders/etherswitch.py (PRE-CREATION) >> >> View Diff <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/> >> > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
