I'll have some time next week to dig into this. Cheers, Jason
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018, 7:13 AM Dr.-Ing. Matthias Jung <jun...@eit.uni-kl.de> wrote: > Hi Giacomo, Gabe, > > I'm a large supporter of SystemC because its 'the' IEEE standard for > simulation, therefore I support always activities towards that direction. > However I have a similar concern like Giacomo. > > I would prefer to just 'use' the SystemC kernel by accellera as kernel for > gem5 in order to have a proper separation between model and kernel. I think > its very interesting for many people to use gem5 in their SystemC > environment also together with commercial IP SystemC models that have a > closed source. With the current aimed approach it would be required to have > access to the source code of all used models in the system and commercial > SystemC tools like Synopsys Platform Architect etc. could not be used. > > > Best, > Matthias > > 8. Juni 2018 15:47, "Giacomo Travaglini" <giacomo.travagl...@arm.com> > schrieb: > > > Hi Gabe, > > > > I have had a quick glance at the patches and there's one thing I don't > understand: > > > > It seems to me that you are sort of reimplementing the SystemC runtime > kernel inside > > > > gem5 for scratch. > > > > Is there a reason for doing it? Can't we just link to the external > SystemC library > > > > and just write some wrappers? > > > > Thanks in advance for the clarifications > > > > Giacomo > > > > ________________________________ > > From: gem5-dev <gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org> on behalf of Gabe Black < > gabebl...@google.com> > > Sent: 08 June 2018 06:32:52 > > To: gem5 Developer List > > Subject: [gem5-dev] systemc reviews > > > > Hi folks. I've posted a lot of systemc reviews recently, and I expect to > > keep doing so for the foreseeable future. To keep the pool of pending CLs > > from growing from a lot to unmanageably a lot please don't let them sit > too > > long if you feel comfortable trying to review them. Alot of these earlier > > ones aren't very interesting, they're just defining header files, stubbed > > out implementations, or importing code from the Accellera version of > > SystemC. There are a few that are a little more interesting though, to > keep > > you from getting bored ;-) > > > > Gabe > > _______________________________________________ > > gem5-dev mailing list > > gem5-dev@gem5.org > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be > > privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the > sender immediately and do not > > disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or > store or copy the information > > in any medium. Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > > gem5-dev mailing list > > gem5-dev@gem5.org > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > gem5-dev@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
