great! Thanks for the support!
Jiayuan
> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:30:40 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: m5-dev@m5sim.org
> Subject: Re: [m5-dev] submit patches: Mesh2D, directory coherence, and
> multithreading
>
> Hi,
>
> Great work. I noticed you added support for multithreading for simple
> CPUs. I wouldn't mind figuring
> out checkpoints with the multithreaded simple CPUs as it would free me
> from EIO trace madness. Let
> me know when the patches are in m5.
>
> -Rick
>
>
> jiayuan meng wrote:
> > Thanks!
> > Yeah, I used mercurial queue to manage the patches. Ali and Steve
> > helped me with that.
> > I'll see if I can pull out the most recent version, and please give me
> > some time to update the
> > patch for the new changeset.
> >
> > Jiayuan
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:50:19 -0700
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: m5-dev@m5sim.org
> > > Subject: Re: [m5-dev] submit patches: Mesh2D, directory coherence,
> > and multithreading
> > >
> > > Wow, that's fantastic. The best thing you can do is get your code
> > > working with the new repository using mercurial and mercurial queues.
> > > If you do that, then we can work with you to make sure that the code
> > > meets all of the requirements (doesn't break things, is reasonably
> > > organized, meets the style guidelines, etc.)
> > >
> > > Did you use a revision control system as you did your work?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Nate
> > >
> > > 2008/7/11 jiayuan meng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > I appreciate all your support to help me with M5. I really love
> > it. I'm
> > > > a graduate student working with Prof. Kevin Skadron at University of
> > > > Virginia. And now,
> > > > I'd like to submit patches to M5 that enables it to simulate CMP
> > > > architecture.
> > > >
> > > > I have a mesh2D model that works well with an MSI directory coherence
> > > > protocol.
> > > > Both the interconnection and directory coherence models are
> > extendable.
> > > > Another patch is to support multithreading for simple CPUs. The
> > cpu can
> > > > switch to another HW thread context if it has a data access.
> > > >
> > > > However, atomic modes are not well tested. And I haven't considered
> > > > checkpoints.
> > > >
> > > > The mercurial patches are based on changeset 5291:456a50cf2a67, a
> > version
> > > > after 2.0beta4 but before 2.0beta5.
> > > > As an "external developer", how do you think I should submit the
> > patches? An
> > > > do you think it would be necessary to update the patches so they
> > are based
> > > > on a more recent changeset?
> > > > If so, which changeset?
> > > >
> > > > Just hope it might be useful.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Jiayuan Meng
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > Need to know now? Get instant answers with Windows Live Messenger.
> > IM on
> > > > your terms.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > m5-dev mailing list
> > > > m5-dev@m5sim.org
> > > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > m5-dev mailing list
> > > m5-dev@m5sim.org
> > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Need to know now? Get instant answers with Windows Live Messenger. IM
> > on your terms.
> > <http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger_072008>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> m5-dev@m5sim.org
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
_________________________________________________________________
Making the world a better place one message at a time.
http://www.imtalkathon.com/?source=EML_WLH_Talkathon_BetterPlace
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
