> My "toy" example of this is say I want to read a integer register from an > instruction. I could either go: > (1) inst->threadContext->readIntReg() > or > (2) inst->cpu->readIntReg() > > In the threadContext object, there is just some redundant call to > cpu->readIntReg() anyway. So you end up calling (1) and (2) instead of just > directly calling (2).
I think that's a holdover from before we had thread support. I'd argue that #2 shouldn't exist. Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
