I am not sure, I am trying to check how much is working in full system mode.
Has ruby been used only in system emulation mode till now?

Pritha

On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 2:27 AM, nathan binkert <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is Ruby supposed to work in FS mode right now?
>
>  Nate
>
> > Just to clarify, the –caches and –l2cache flags are not used by Ruby.
> Also
> > you might want to specify the –num-dirs=4 to create a symmetric system,
> but
> > if you don’t, I believe the default of 1 directory should still work.
> >
> > There are a couple things I would like you to try:
> >
> > 1.       Could  you compile the m5.debug version of MOESI_hammer and see
> if
> > you can gather any additional information.
> >
> > 2.       Could you run with the classic memory system using fs.py and
> timing
> > mode and see if you encounter problems.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brad
> >
> >
> >
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf
> > Of Pritha Ghoshal
> > Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 11:13 AM
> > To: M5 Developer List
> > Subject: Re: [m5-dev] MESI_CMP directory protocol with more than 2
> > processors
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Brad,
> >
> > I tried MOESI Hammer protocol with 4 processors. I am still getting an
> > error:
> > SMP: Processor 1 failed to start.
> > Slave CPU 2 console command START
> > SlaveCmd: restart FFFFFC0000310020 FFFFFC0000310020 vptb FFFFFFFE00000000
> > my_rpb FFFFFC0000018680 my_rpb_phys 18680
> > SMP: Processor 3 failed to start.
> > Brought up 2 CPUs
> >
> > My command line is
> >     ./build/ALPHA_FS_MOESI_hammer/m5.opt ./configs/example/ruby_fs.py -t
> > --caches --l2cache -n 4 -b bodytrack
> >
> > Thanks for your help..
> >
> > Pritha
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Beckmann, Brad <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pritha,
> >
> > In general, the protocols in M5 aren’t quite ready for “primetime” and I
> > wouldn’t be surprised if you encounter bugs like the one you mentioned.
> I’m
> > happy to help you out and determine what the problem may be.  However, be
> > warned that I might not be able to immediately create and push in a fix.
> >
> > Could you send me the specific command line you ran?  Also could you
> confirm
> > that the MOESI hammer protocol with 4 processors works and that your
> problem
> > is isolated to the MESI CMP directory protocol.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brad
> >
> >
> >
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf
> > Of Pritha Ghoshal
> > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 7:25 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [m5-dev] MESI_CMP directory protocol with more than 2 processors
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to run MESI CMP directory protocol on M5. It seems to be
> > functioning properly with 1 processor and 2 processors. But when I tried
> to
> > run 4 processors, am getting the error:
> >
> > SMP: Processor 1 failed to start.
> >
> > SMP: Processor 2 failed to start.
> >
> > Therefore only 2 processors are getting launched, and even after that its
> > not executing properly, am getting the following error repeatedly after
> > sometime
> >
> > hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x64
> >
> > hda: DMA interrupt recovery
> >
> > hda: lost interrupt
> >
> > Could someone help me regarding this? I am not sure where to look into
> for
> > trying to understand the reason of the problem...
> >
> > Thank you
> > Pritha
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to