> So if we explicitly handled the SIGABRT signal, we would only want to do > that if we are running interactively, correct? If so, then we would still > have some sort of conditional similar, if not the same as, the current > conditional in the assert macro “if (isatty(STDIN_FILENO))”. If my > understanding is correct, then we would still have multiple behaviors for > assert. One when the running interactively and another when running in > batch mode.
Right. Though, we'd probably only handle the SIGABRT in the case of an interactive session as opposed to doing the check in the handler. Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
