Yes, but right now my repo is a couple weeks behind the main repo and I'd rather get all these patches resolved first, then sync up with main repo and do my final regression testing once.
Brad > -----Original Message----- > From: m5-dev-boun...@m5sim.org [mailto:m5-dev-boun...@m5sim.org] > On Behalf Of Gabe Black > Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 2:26 AM > To: M5 Developer List > Subject: Re: [m5-dev] Error in Simulating Mesh Network > > You should be able to move that around any other patches ahead of it, right? > It's so simple I wouldn't expect it to really depend on the intervening > patches. > > Gabe > > Beckmann, Brad wrote: > > Hi Nilay, > > > > Yes, I am aware of this problem and one of the patches > (http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/381/) I'm planning to check in does fix this. > Unfortunately, those patches are being hung up because I need to do some > more work on another one of them and right now I don't have any time to do > so. As you can see from the patch, it is a very simple fix, so you may want > to > do it locally if it blocking you. > > > > Brad > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: m5-dev-boun...@m5sim.org [mailto:m5-dev- > boun...@m5sim.org] On > >> Behalf Of Nilay Vaish > >> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 6:16 AM > >> To: m5-dev@m5sim.org > >> Subject: [m5-dev] Error in Simulating Mesh Network > >> > >> Brad, I tried simulating a mesh network with four processors. > >> > >> ./build/ALPHA_FS_MOESI_hammer/m5.prof > ./configs/example/ruby_fs.py - > >> -maxtick 200000000000 -n 4 --topology Mesh --mesh-rows 2 > >> --num-l2cache 4 --num-dir 4 > >> > >> I receive the following error: > >> > >> panic: FIFO ordering violated: [MessageBuffer: consumer-yes [ > >> [71227521, 870, 1; ] ]] [Version 1, L1Cache, triggerQueue_in] > >> name: [Version 1, L1Cache, triggerQueue_in] current time: 71227512 > delta: > >> 1 arrival_time: 71227513 last arrival_time: 71227521 > >> @ cycle 35613756000 > >> > [enqueue:build/ALPHA_FS_MOESI_hammer/mem/ruby/buffers/MessageB > >> uffer.cc, > >> line 198] > >> > >> Do you think that the options I have specified should work correctly? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Nilay > >> _______________________________________________ > >> m5-dev mailing list > >> m5-dev@m5sim.org > >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > m5-dev mailing list > > m5-dev@m5sim.org > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > m5-dev@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
