>> I was looking at the structure of the tree, and a few of the files at >> the root are a little stale. The LICENSE file doesn't list any of the >> other institutions that have a files in the tree and is up to 2008 >> instead of 2011. The README and RELEASE_NOTES files reflect beta 6 and >> are also dated 2008. The README file could probably be just touched up >> and still be useful. RELEASE_NOTES can probably be deleted outright >> since we don't have releases any more.
What happened to updating LICENSE? > I decided not to mention it before, but we also have an AUTHORS file > which is a little out of date. For instance, I don't think it includes > the contribution of Power support. I like being listed in that file and > I'm sure other people like the recognition as well, but the decision of > what and who to include is a bit arbitrary and could be considered > unfair. The repository history will have some of that information and is > more unbiased. I think we should get rid of that file, but only if the > other people on it are ok with it too. I'm OK with getting rid of AUTHORS. If we want to keep it, it should probably be on the wiki instead anyway. Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
