Brian - Thanx for the review - I will work with Danny to get the editorial issues corrected. Some replies to your non-editorial questions/issues:
Do you want the IESG to also reclassify RFC3786 as Historic? If so, I suggest saying this explicitly in the Introduction. LES: I would think obsolete is more appropriate. The draft uses the phrase "Virtual IS" without defining it. I see that RFC3786 defines and uses "Virtual System". LES: Agreed - we need a definition. Is it "IS-Alias" or "IS Alias ID"? I don't see a reason for having two names for the same TLV. LES: Agreed - we'll make this consistent. What happens when a legacy implementation receives an IS Alias ID, IS Neighbor Attribute, or MT IS Neighbor Attribute TLV? Is silent discard specified in the IS-IS standard? LES: Yes. See ISO 10589 Section 9.5: "Any codes in a received PDU that are not recognised shall be ignored." Similar text is found in the sections for each PDU type. For example in Section 9.8: "Any codes in a received LSP that are not recognised are ignored and passed through unchanged." Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 5:39 PM > To: General Area Review Team > Cc: Ross Callon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; isis- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-wg-extlsp-03.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
