Hi Les, that all seems clear to me. Just one point:
> Do you want the IESG to also reclassify RFC3786 as Historic?
> If so, I suggest saying this explicitly in the Introduction.
>
> LES: I would think obsolete is more appropriate.
Actually you could do both, I think, but I agree that 'obsoletes'
is a good idea. (In case anybody's wondering, there are already
a few examples of a standards track document obsoleting an
Informational, e.g. RFC4648.)
Thanks
Brian
On 2008-10-28 17:03, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
> Brian -
>
> Thanx for the review - I will work with Danny to get the editorial
> issues corrected. Some replies to your non-editorial questions/issues:
>
> Do you want the IESG to also reclassify RFC3786 as Historic?
> If so, I suggest saying this explicitly in the Introduction.
>
> LES: I would think obsolete is more appropriate.
>
> The draft uses the phrase "Virtual IS" without defining it. I see
> that RFC3786 defines and uses "Virtual System".
>
> LES: Agreed - we need a definition.
>
> Is it "IS-Alias" or "IS Alias ID"? I don't see a reason for having
> two names for the same TLV.
>
> LES: Agreed - we'll make this consistent.
>
> What happens when a legacy implementation receives an IS Alias ID,
> IS Neighbor Attribute, or MT IS Neighbor Attribute TLV?
> Is silent discard specified in the IS-IS standard?
>
> LES: Yes. See ISO 10589 Section 9.5:
>
> "Any codes in a received PDU that are not recognised shall be ignored."
>
> Similar text is found in the sections for each PDU type. For example in
> Section 9.8:
>
> "Any codes in a received LSP that are not recognised are ignored and
> passed through unchanged."
>
> Les
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 5:39 PM
>> To: General Area Review Team
>> Cc: Ross Callon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; isis-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-wg-extlsp-03.txt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
