On 22 January 2014 13:00, Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote: > Is your concern that the sentence "IPv6 is considered the strategic answer" > in section 2 is not stressed enough?
I think that the text in the second paragraph is slightly more loaded. In particular, These issues leave an operator in a precarious position which may lead to the decision to deploy CGN. The rest of the section uses similarly loaded: The ability to replace IPv4-only equipment may be out of the control of the operator, and even when it's in the administrative control, it poses both cost and technical challenges as operators build out massive programs for equipment retirement or upgrade. "precarious position", "poses both cost and technical challenges", ... all arguably true, but not strictly neutral. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
