Jari, I just responded to the gen-art list and Martin on his comments.
I have made a number of changes that address his comments and have used much of his text. ( I will be sending the Benoit and the rest of the IESG a full summary of changes and new version posting tonight). This includes the changes to section 6 as prescribed. regards, Victor K On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.ar...@piuha.net> wrote: > Thanks for your detailed review, Martin! > > And thank you Victor for a very useful document! > > Much of the discussion in this thread is important but also partly > editorial. I'll leave it to sort out between yourselves. > > However, I do think Section 6 last sentence: > > Should a provide choose to use non-assigned IP address space within > their translation realms, then considerations may apply. > > gives an odd impression. We already have shared address space (as the > document notes elsewhere), so it is not clear to me what the above might > entail, particularly when (a) regular address space assignments go through > the RIR system not IANA (b) use of unassigned address space is probably not > something that we want to recommend and (c) if we need to do something > beyond the existing shared address space allocation, then that probably > deserves its own document. > > I can see that Victor you've already agreed to make a change wrt Section > 6. I just wanted to check that this is indeed the plan, so that we can move > on to approving the document :-) > > Jari > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
