Thanks for the review, Tom! I have balloted no-obj.
Jari On 15 Feb 2015, at 22:43, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tom, thanks for the review. > > On 2/14/15 6:57 PM, Tom Taylor wrote: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >> you may receive. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-precis-framework-22 >> Reviewer: Tom Taylor >> Review Date: 2015-02-14 >> IETF LC End Date: 2015-02-19 >> IESG Telechat date: 2015-02-19 >> >> Summary: Ready to go with one nit. Noted that idNits is not happy with >> the reference to RFC 20 because of the latter's unknown state. > > Actually, RFC 20 is now Internet Standard (only 46 years in the making!): > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/rlIsY8yvvKhbkbkuk2mcQ-ylSNw > > But perhaps the IDnits database doesn't know that yet. > >> Major issues: >> >> Minor issues: >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> >> Section 1, bullet a: s/included protocol/included in a protocol/ > > Noted, thanks! > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://andyet.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
