Don't be depress Sarah if female participation remains low. Even if Wikipedia was a perfect place without any bias, it would still be a project from the "real world" were lot of forces prevent women from editing : lower confidence in themselves, less free time, lower access to education.
We can't change the world, juste make our small environnement a little less unjust. Caroline 2012/2/2 John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, emijrp <emi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2012/2/2 Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> > >>... > >> What else are people seeing in their chosen languages that might be > >> interesting? Anything surprising? > >> > > > > No. Only a few examples where women are 15-25% of edits some days but in > > small Wikipedias or sister projects. They are not representative. > > I think (hope..) you might find a high female participate rate even if > you aggregate across all of the Wikisource projects. > > -- > John Vandenberg > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap