Hear hear! On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Carol Moore DC <carolmoor...@verizon.net>wrote:
> Sounds good... go for it... > On 6/3/2012 12:50 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I think we're on the "Beating a dead horse" again situation with this > subject.[1] We will be going in circles about it - most of us seem to not > care as much as others, and no one seems to be taking any direct action at > this point. *I'm evening proposing this: someone can create a mailing > list or an on-wiki space (even better!) to continue the discussion and > those folks interested in examining pornography, sex related, whatnot > images on Wikimedia projects can discuss it until their hearts content and > think about ways to take action, etc.* > > After request from a few participants off list and my own personal > interest, I'm declaring that we kill this thread and move on. > > Participants in this thread may now under go moderator regarding this > specific thread. > > And what's more interesting, is that the majority of women who are > participating in this conversation seem to be the one's with the least > concern about it, go figure. > > Thanks everyone, > > Sarah > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flogging_a_dead_horse > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
