Interesting commentary as far as it went. I wish he'd delved a little
further into what he was saying.

Perception is important. I think people can act in good faith (for
instance to reduce the size of a massive category) without realizing
the effect of how the result looks. It may not be meant in a sexist
way, but if the effect is "ghettoization", it looks sexist, and that
does matter. There is the real need though to find women novelists,
male nurses, etc. for studies. Apparently German WP has a system
whereby one can query category intersections that are defined by the
end user. ?This souns like a plausible solution, but I haven't used it
myself (and do't speak German).

Just thinking out loud here...
Lady

On 4/29/13, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sparked by the recent...situation..
>
> http://reagle.org/joseph/pelican/social/wikipedia-and-gendered-categories.html
>
> Sar
>
>
> --
> *Sarah Stierch*
> */Museumist and open culture advocate/*
>  >>Visit sarahstierch.com <http://sarahstierch.com><<
>

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to