Thanks for your reply, Joseph - fair enough! :) I agree with you - I think there have been some major lapses of assumption of good faith from both (all?) sides.
(Ouch looking back at my post, I'm wishing I could hit edit. The edit summary would be something along the lines of "typo fixing".) On 4/29/13, Joseph Reagle <joseph.2...@reagle.org> wrote: > On 04/29/2013 10:03 PM, Lady of Shalott wrote: >> Interesting commentary as far as it went. I wish he'd delved a little >> further into what he was saying. >> ... >> Just thinking out loud here... > > I'm actually on this list :) and was just thinking out loud as well to > see if I could understand the incident since I was seeing pretty strong > claims (both "Wikipedia is sexist" and "this is journalism run amok.") > For instance, people continue to report that Filipacchi is a reporter > for NYT when these were op-eds. > _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
