On 30 April 2018 at 13:34, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 April 2018 at 08:29, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 19:53:45 +0200
>>> From: Jan Iversen <j...@apache.org>
>>> To: general@attic.apache.org
>>> Subject: discussion/vote new site (again, but last time from me)
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Based on a suggestion from Henk, I hereby once again try to start a
>>> discussion/vote on the new site.
>>
>>
>>   Ok ; great ; thanks.
>>
>>> We need to select either lua-site or jekyll-site. I strongly believe
>>> there are no reasons to polish the sites more before selecting, it is
>>> apparent how both sites will work.
>>
>>
>>   Let me say first that Sebb did a great job perfecting the config
>>   (json/yaml file) ; since it handles all the past retirements,
>>   we can be confident that either solution can handle (almost)
>>   any future case.
>
> Let's not forget that Jani created the initial JSON file contents.
> That was quite a bit of work.
>
>>   The problem at hand is simple :
>>
>>   -- there is only one 'base' ; all generated pages look the same.
>>   -- there is only one 'template' : base + project-list (on the right)
>>   -- there are only 4 (kinds of) pages :
>>      -- index.html      : template + index.txt
>>      -- process.html    : template + process.txt
>>      -- resolution.html : template + resolution.txt
>>      -- $project.html   : template + <proj-data>
>>         where <proj-data> is generated from the config.
>
> Note that proj-data includes layout in the above list.
>
>>   -- only 3 substitutions are needed [project-list, title, $proj-data].
>
> Additional substitutions of need to be made to create the proj-data as
> that is a mix of variable data with fixed layout.
>
>>   [main point] I think using a template system is, at best, unnecessary.
>>   Note that the jekyll templates aren't 'easy' (full of if/then/else's),
>
> I contend that the Perl version is harder to follow.
>
>>   and can't be understood unless you look at the code too.
>
> In the lua case, the conditional and looping code is buried inside the
> Perl script.
>
>>   [I know, because I had to follow Sebb, as he added more and more ;-]
>>   With the lua stuff, the 'logic' is in one place.
>
> I agree that the logic is in one place, but the presentation is mixed
> in with it.
>
> In the Jekyll case, there is some logic to massage the data in Ruby,
> but all the presentation logic is in templates.
>
> I think that is easier to follow.
>
> For example, compare how the project page data is generated:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/site-jekyll/src/_layouts/project.html?view=markup#l35
>
> To me it's clear that there is a table with data fields in it.
> And it's obvious how to omit parts of the output if required.
>
> The same structure in the Perl script is mainly generated here AFAICT:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/site-lua/mk-stuff?view=markup#l211
>
> Except that is only part of it.
>
> At present the code generates a Board entry in the table regardless of
> whether it is a sub-project or not. How would you fix that so it
> agrees with the existing Attic site?
>
>>   -- the jekyll stuff uses ruby, ant and jekyll ; requiring installs.
>
> I chose Jekyll because it is already used by other projects.
> AFAIK at least Ruby and Ant are available on all the CI nodes.
>
>>      the lua stuff uses only perl and make ; always available,

However it turns out that JSON.pm is not (yet) installed on the Buildbot node.

>>      and more widely used/known.
>
> The Perl script itself is home-grown and not used anywhere else.
>
>>   -- the lua tree looks simpler than the jekyll tree ...
>
> If you are referring to the directory structure that is partly because
> the lua data/ dir contains both data and layout.
>
>>   As the problem is simple, a simple solution is sufficient.
>
> I disagree that the Perl script is simple.
>
> It's a well-written script, but it is hard to follow - mainly because
> it mixes content with presentation.
>
>>> jan I
>>
>>
>>   Regards,
>>
>>   Henk Penning
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------   _
>> Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta                 R Uithof MG-403    _/ \_
>> Faculty of Science, Utrecht University    T +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \
>> Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL          F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/
>> http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M penn...@uu.nl     \_/

Reply via email to