Sent from my iPad

> On 30 Apr 2018, at 14:34, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 30 April 2018 at 08:29, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote:
>>> 
>>> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 19:53:45 +0200
>>> From: Jan Iversen <j...@apache.org>
>>> To: general@attic.apache.org
>>> Subject: discussion/vote new site (again, but last time from me)
>>> 
>>> Hi.
>>> 
>>> Based on a suggestion from Henk, I hereby once again try to start a
>>> discussion/vote on the new site.
>> 
>> 
>>  Ok ; great ; thanks.
>> 
>>> We need to select either lua-site or jekyll-site. I strongly believe
>>> there are no reasons to polish the sites more before selecting, it is
>>> apparent how both sites will work.
>> 
>> 
>>  Let me say first that Sebb did a great job perfecting the config
>>  (json/yaml file) ; since it handles all the past retirements,
>>  we can be confident that either solution can handle (almost)
>>  any future case.
> 
> Let's not forget that Jani created the initial JSON file contents.
> That was quite a bit of work.
Thanks, but I honestly am sad that I did not choose another solution, because 
see what it brought us all, I personally have lately used around the same time 
it took me to retire 10 projects, which is far more than I signed up to do.
> 
>>  The problem at hand is simple :
>> 
>>  -- there is only one 'base' ; all generated pages look the same.
>>  -- there is only one 'template' : base + project-list (on the right)
>>  -- there are only 4 (kinds of) pages :
>>     -- index.html      : template + index.txt
>>     -- process.html    : template + process.txt
>>     -- resolution.html : template + resolution.txt
>>     -- $project.html   : template + <proj-data>
>>        where <proj-data> is generated from the config.
> 
> Note that proj-data includes layout in the above list.
> 
>>  -- only 3 substitutions are needed [project-list, title, $proj-data].
> 
> Additional substitutions of need to be made to create the proj-data as
> that is a mix of variable data with fixed layout.
> 
>>  [main point] I think using a template system is, at best, unnecessary.
>>  Note that the jekyll templates aren't 'easy' (full of if/then/else's),
> 
> I contend that the Perl version is harder to follow.
I have problems understanding the jekyll templates. To me it seems the 
jekyll-site contains many more files (source) than the lua-site, I suppose that 
adds complexity.
> 
>>  and can't be understood unless you look at the code too.
> 
> In the lua case, the conditional and looping code is buried inside the
> Perl script.
> 
>>  [I know, because I had to follow Sebb, as he added more and more ;-]
>>  With the lua stuff, the 'logic' is in one place.
> 
> I agree that the logic is in one place, but the presentation is mixed
> in with it.
> 
> In the Jekyll case, there is some logic to massage the data in Ruby,
> but all the presentation logic is in templates.
> 
> I think that is easier to follow.
I guess it is more a question of what you are used to use.
> 
> For example, compare how the project page data is generated:
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/site-jekyll/src/_layouts/project.html?view=markup#l35
> 
> To me it's clear that there is a table with data fields in it.
> And it's obvious how to omit parts of the output if required.
> 
> The same structure in the Perl script is mainly generated here AFAICT:
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/site-lua/mk-stuff?view=markup#l211
> 
> Except that is only part of it.
> 
> At present the code generates a Board entry in the table regardless of
> whether it is a sub-project or not. How would you fix that so it
> agrees with the existing Attic site?
That was why the board entry was sometimes empty in my json file.

rgds
jan i
> 
>>  -- the jekyll stuff uses ruby, ant and jekyll ; requiring installs.
> 
> I chose Jekyll because it is already used by other projects.
> AFAIK at least Ruby and Ant are available on all the CI nodes.
> 
>>     the lua stuff uses only perl and make ; always available,
>>     and more widely used/known.
> 
> The Perl script itself is home-grown and not used anywhere else.
> 
>>  -- the lua tree looks simpler than the jekyll tree ...
> 
> If you are referring to the directory structure that is partly because
> the lua data/ dir contains both data and layout.
> 
>>  As the problem is simple, a simple solution is sufficient.
> 
> I disagree that the Perl script is simple.
> 
> It's a well-written script, but it is hard to follow - mainly because
> it mixes content with presentation.
> 
>>> jan I
>> 
>> 
>>  Regards,
>> 
>>  Henk Penning
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------   _
>> Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta                 R Uithof MG-403    _/ \_
>> Faculty of Science, Utrecht University    T +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \
>> Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL          F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/
>> http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M penn...@uu.nl     \_/

Reply via email to