Hi, What granularity do you think that should be allowable as commons codebases? Should we define the granularity as focus, as number of files, as committers or what?
For example. Where I am from we have a small library for dealing with Java Extensions (think .dlls or .sos with additional metadata). When the component started it had 2-3 source files with a single purpose. Over time it grew to be about 15-20 source files + ~40 unit tests. I guess my question is, Would it have been accepted when it was tiny (2-3 source files), small or does it still not qualify. It matches other criteria (and was actually the merge of multiple projects code) but I am curious what you consider of the scope. It probably does not warrant it's own mailing list or it's own dedicated space. However it is a reusable focused component. What do you think of this sort of situation (translated as appropriate for your own technology)? In or out? -- Cheers, Peter Donald -------------------------------------------------- "An intellectual is someone who has been educated beyond their intelligence." --------------------------------------------------
