Reply-To again.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Sanders 
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:11 AM
To: 'Peter Donald'
Subject: RE: Granularity of Codebases?


> What granularity do you think that should be allowable as
> commons codebases? 
> Should we define the granularity as focus, as number of 
> files, as committers 
> or what?
> 
> For example. Where I am from we have a small library for
> dealing with Java 
> Extensions (think .dlls or .sos with additional metadata). 
> When the component 
> started it had 2-3 source files with a single purpose. Over 
> time it grew to 
> be about 15-20 source files + ~40 unit tests. 
> 
> I guess my question is, Would it have been accepted when it
> was tiny (2-3 
> source files), small or does it still not qualify. It matches 
> other criteria 
> (and was actually the merge of multiple projects code) but I 
> am curious what 
> you consider of the scope. 

I think that both of these examples should be in scope.

Scott

Reply via email to