On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:03, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Friday, October 18, 2002 7:29 PM +1000 Peter Donald > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What granularity do you think that should be allowable as commons > > codebases? Should we define the granularity as focus, as number of > > files, as committers or what? > > Focus. > > IMHO, size is not a concern for the 'commons' project. It's whether > the sub-project meets the goals or not.
+1 > As I suggested earlier, I would perhaps like to see reuse of > infrastructure for smaller components (be it mailing lists, CVS, > etc). Once a larger community develops, then we can give it its own > infrastructure. +1 -- Cheers, Peter Donald "All my life I wanted to be someone; I guess I should have been more specific." -- Jane Wagner
