Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:31:51AM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Just one question: where would we put the xml sources, and where the results?
Do you mean where under the commons-site CVS repository?
I don't know how it's supposed to be done since in the projects I'm in it's different for all.
In some the site xml docs are in the project CVS and in the site CVS we place only the resulting html.
In others we put all the site stuff in the site CVS and point the cron job that updates the site to the directory where we commit the results of the build.
In others the xml docs are in one of the two CVSes and the site build results are directly sent to the web server, since the sources are all that is needed to leave a trace.
The last approach is what we have been doing as an experiment with forrest, using our "forrestbot", that called by a cron job builds and updtes the site every two hours on a test server.
Some projects asked us to be able to commit the main site manually and have the automatic one in a subdir, as a "cutting-edge" version for users of the latest and greatest code.
I'm ok with any of these possibilities (presonally I prefer the last), just wanted to know what we would prefer to do.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------