On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:34, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Aaron Bannert wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:31:51AM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >>Just one question: where would we put the xml sources, and where the > >>results? > > > > Do you mean where under the commons-site CVS repository? > > I don't know how it's supposed to be done since in the projects I'm in > it's different for all. > > In some the site xml docs are in the project CVS and in the site CVS we > place only the resulting html. > > In others we put all the site stuff in the site CVS and point the cron > job that updates the site to the directory where we commit the results > of the build. > > In others the xml docs are in one of the two CVSes and the site build > results are directly sent to the web server, since the sources are all > that is needed to leave a trace. > > The last approach is what we have been doing as an experiment with > forrest, using our "forrestbot", that called by a cron job builds and > updtes the site every two hours on a test server. > > Some projects asked us to be able to commit the main site manually and > have the automatic one in a subdir, as a "cutting-edge" version for > users of the latest and greatest code. > > I'm ok with any of these possibilities (presonally I prefer the last), > just wanted to know what we would prefer to do.
I would prefer the last. I get nervous when there is anything "auto" in a developing project ;) -- Cheers, Peter Donald ----------------------------------------------- "You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." -Mark Twain -----------------------------------------------
