That's why a search for "looping" should probably also point to a
discussion of "how to avoid loops in J, and why you should". Each search
term should provide links to both the closest J equivalent to that concept,
as well as recommended J approaches This will help introduce newbies to
these new concepts *as they need them*, rather that making a newbie go
through all the J doc, just to find the one concept they need..

Skip Cave
Cave Consulting LLC


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Devon McCormick <[email protected]>wrote:

> One of the dangers against which we should warn someone taking this
> approach is that J embodies an unusual way of thinking about algorithms.
> Matching to keywords in another language only approximates what you need to
> know - it doesn't illuminate what's different about the language.  I think
> this is what's behind the digressions in the "VB/J" string functions
> example I referenced earlier: it's useful to understand that J is doing
> general array operations that apply to arrays of numbers, for instance.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Russell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Agree. In particular about NuVov, and add the J reference card, the
> books,
> > the phrases and (what ever happened to) the IX link from the help menu.
> In
> > addition to the main page search box the newcomer needs to learn about
> wiki
> > searches and fourms searches, and findinfiles, the foreign conjunction
> > categories, etc.
> >
> > It is sad that even after 10+ years as a J fan and lurker on the J
> fourms,
> > J is the one language in which I have never become productive, much less
> > proficient.
> >
> > I think a J Glossary, referenced from a more obvious "readme", or "noob
> > enter here" starting point to provide an overview of the site, the
> > language, and the J libraries would help.
> >
> > (Or maybe I just don't have enough synapses left in my old age.)
> >
> > (Raul--yes I am still working on my list of searches/questions I needed
> as
> > I revisited J on my iPhone and iPad.)
> >
> > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Skip Cave <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ideally, a newbie should be able to type the word "assignment" into the
> > > search box on the J Software main page, and get several results,
> > including
> > > links to Is (local) and Is (global) on the NuVoc and standard
> vocabulary
> > > pages. Additional links to pages discussing assignment in "J for C
> > > Programmers", "Learning J" and other doc would be great. Since this
> > feature
> > > would be oriented to newbies, the NuVoc pages should probably be at the
> > top
> > > of the list..
> > >
> > > When learning a new programming language, reading through all the doc
> > > causes information overload, at least for me. To get a flavor for the
> > > language, I like to start by searching for common programming
> functions,
> > > like assignment, looping, indexing, conditionals, subroutines, etc.
> Once
> > I
> > > get an Idea where the information about these concepts reside in the
> > > documentation, I will stat reading those sections. Then as I require a
> > new
> > > function, I will type the common name of that function in the search
> box,
> > > and continue to explore from there. To me, this is a much more
> efficient
> > > way to learn a language, rather that trying to absorb the whole range
> of
> > > syntax and functionality presented in the order the documentation
> authors
> > > want to present it.,
> > >
> > > Of course, the "common name" for any function depends somewhat on what
> > > programing language you are familiar with. That's why it's important to
> > > have as many different related keywords as possible for "subroutine".
> > >
> > > Skip
> > >
> > > Skip Cave
> > > Cave Consulting LLC
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> If you would put together a list of words (and perhaps phrases?) that
> > need
> > >> definition, I (or we) would be happy to fill in the definitions, and
> > supply
> > >> a few small examples.
> > >>
> > >> We might need to go several rounds of this to adequately satisfy you,
> > but
> > >> that's ok.
> > >>
> > >> Or maybe we have an adequate reference to refer you to? But if that
> were
> > >> the case, I imagine the search engines would have found it for you. So
> > >> instead let's maybe think about hashing out something that might be a
> > >> suitable addition to the J wiki?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Raul
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Jim Russell <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> (Sorry, I got no further than "No," when I put my iphone back in my
> > shirt
> > >>> pocket and "man boob" sent it.)
> > >>>
> > >>> More later when I try to recall all the dumb words phrases I was
> > >>> fruitlessly trying to find as I played with J on my iPhone this past
> > >> week.
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Feb 9, 2014, at 8:22 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Do you mean like
> http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/vocabul.htm
> > ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Raul
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Jim Russell <[email protected]
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>> I suspect that a glossary of J (and related programming terms)
> would
> > >>> help a great deal. Or does one exist?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Feb 9, 2014, at 1:30 AM, Skip Cave <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I was looking over NuVoc the other day, and thinking how it helped
> > me
> > >>> learn
> > >>>>>> the J primitives. My next thought was how I wished that we could
> fix
> > >>> the J
> > >>>>>> search engine so that when newbies searched for stuff in the J
> wiki
> > >>> using
> > >>>>>> traditional programming lingo, they would automatically find the J
> > >>>>>> equivalent functions.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> When J gave new names to all the J programming elements, it was
> all
> > >> for
> > >>>>>> good reasons. However that made it really hard to learn J by
> > >> searching
> > >>> the
> > >>>>>> wiki for programming concepts, using common programming names.
> When
> > I
> > >>> am
> > >>>>>> programming in J, I often come to a point where I know what I want
> > to
> > >>> do,
> > >>>>>> and I know what most other programming languages would call what I
> > >>> want to
> > >>>>>> do. If I search for that name in the J wiki though, I usually come
> > up
> > >>>>>> empty-handed.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> What we really need in NuVoc, as well as all of the J doc, is a
> set
> > >> of
> > >>>>>> common-use keywords attached to every J concept. Thus if a newbie
> > >>> searches
> > >>>>>> for "assignment", he will get the vocabulary and dictionary pages
> > for
> > >>> Is
> > >>>>>> (local) and Is (global), When he searches for "indexing" he will
> get
> > >>> the
> > >>>>>> Catalog pages. I could go on like this for quite awhile.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Also  when newbies or anyone stumbles upon a new concept in any of
> > >> the
> > >>> J
> > >>>>>> doc, we should make it easy for that person to add new keywords to
> > >>> that doc
> > >>>>>> page. Hopefully the keywords they add will make it easier for the
> > >> next
> > >>>>>> person to find that concept in the future.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> So my proposal is that each NuVoc page (and all J doc pages for
> that
> > >>>>>> matter) needs a list of keywords at (say) the bottom of the page,
> > >>> giving
> > >>>>>> common programming names for the J concept on that page. In that
> > >> way, a
> > >>>>>> newbie searching for "assignment" would at least have a chance of
> > >>> finding
> > >>>>>> what he is looking for.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> However, my idea is more that just putting a list of keywords on
> > >> every
> > >>> doc
> > >>>>>> page, As has been discussed on the J mail list, Newbies who are
> > >> trying
> > >>> to
> > >>>>>> learn J, know what they are looking for, when they search for a
> > >>> particular
> > >>>>>> concept. What If we could make it so when someone finally does
> find
> > >>> what
> > >>>>>> they were looking for, they could easily add words to the keyword
> > >> list
> > >>> on
> > >>>>>> the doc page they found. They could add the words that they were
> > >> using
> > >>> to
> > >>>>>> (unsuccessfully) search for that concept. Then each doc page would
> > >>> start to
> > >>>>>> collect keywords that people commonly use for that concept, making
> > it
> > >>> much
> > >>>>>> easier for newbies (and even casual J user oldies like me) to find
> > >> that
> > >>>>>> concept in the future.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> There needs to be an easy (but controlled, and perhaps curated)
> way
> > >> to
> > >>> put
> > >>>>>> a new keyword on any doc page, while that page is being viewed.
> > There
> > >>> needs
> > >>>>>> to be a brief statement above the keyword block explaining what it
> > >> is,
> > >>> how
> > >>>>>> to add a keyword, and why one should do it.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I believe that in the long run, this keyword scheme could have a
> > >> bigger
> > >>>>>> impact on reducing the "steep learning curve" of J than almost any
> > >>> other
> > >>>>>> documentation mechanism.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Skip
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Skip Cave
> > >>>>>> Cave Consulting LLC
> > >>>>>>
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>> For information about J forums see
> > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>>>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> For information about J forums see
> > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> For information about J forums see
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Devon McCormick, CFA
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to